Intention From April 4th, 2015 or 21, or 2014

For whether judging a person's intention,
justice court, all sorts of avariety

wel ook at the intention
It ultimately comes down to the intention of the porprtraior, and not, aboslutely not its "actions"


The target could have said compliment,
or the target could have said angry words.
Regardless to the action, it is the intention we look at.
Though indeed the action took place may lead to and indicate its intention, but it shall not be used directly


Indeed, the action took place indicates nothing.
1001, A B CD:
=> the person could be caring through compliments
=> the person could be caring through angery tones
=> the person could be hating through hateful words
=> a person could be hating through complimenting

Messages of the Day

"No signs of Zergs here.  Units, time for a redenvouz."

"I couldn't really care about amongst other things.  This is the society that discredit the successful ones, and make up excuses to the weak.  They fail 'cause they are losers, ever think of that?  Perhaps it's because they weren't bullied or deprived of anything, but are natural fails."

"Anybody who reads books don't like zergers.  The way this country is going is commonly found by proper people to be highly meebleskew at least, and grotesque at best."


"A teeth of a zerger is zerger teeth.
A mouth of a zerger is a zerger mouth.
A lung of a zerger is a zerger lung.
A gut of a zerger is a zerger gut"



"These ones... dares to claim it like we are inlegit and we are to be found at  fault, blah blah excessive made-up mimik-tone disreasoning and more.  Well, ain't that the exact same as invisible bile leeches's way.  Guards, code B."

---

----

---