tag section oversplash: elements, life points,
The Citadel uses traitors to control/suppress/fight the regular humans.
Anything is possible, isn't it. And there are two sides to each thing.
The concept of robot rebellion, going against human master's biddings after finally a robot spontaneous revolution that sparks across the world is a popular theme in the sci-fan genre.
It's important for us to highlight that the basis of this robot take-over consist of:
- strong and prominent position; being security guards, soldiers, key production personnels, at same time being in large numbers
- overly trusted, given no other force to quarantine otherthan assumed full-royalty
- general underestimation, false-line assumption and the public preception that these will remain royal and are fully under control, with nothing to be concerned about
Peaking at today's social composition, we see the samething happening. Instead of robots, or robotic beings visiblely in aluminum and steel, large deposits of biological robots may signal a similar fate.
Unlike in the movies where robots begin realizing their current positions, the reality we are in might be one where a silent take-over (or two) had already occured. To find out this, we'd have to ask the Zionists for providing an explaination.
What's also worthy to note is that not every take-over has to be barbaric, dramatic like the one in the movie, jumping from car to car, explosion colors covering the whole screen and fire and death. Robot revolution can be quiet, as quite as it can be.
These biological robots right now make up 98% of the consumer base for electronics. They are also the largest receipients of social welfares. In addition, there has been 0 occasion where a statesmen publicly directly denounced them. All of this in together goes to show that the biological robots are in the ranks of kings, and beyond: since they are king to the point that no one mentions them in that title: like an indestructible demigod that has descended down to earth.
- - - -- ---- -- --- ---- - - - -
omg it's orange
yep yep font test 123 0 good good
asdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasdasd
1. most of the battle between righteous and force is faught not by bloodshed of individual killings, but by subverting each other's elements
2. there are two sides in this world: good and bad. neutral is rare
3. about any criminal is found on the bad side as good guy is found on good side
4. having a law that punishes based on murder, arson, kidnapping, thief and such would only result in the eventual submerge of all elements of good, therefrom the rise, of the super citadel and blights
5. one wise can be assured that such a law would be utilized by the gossip-specialist foul beings to falsify reasons for assisting their coming of an apallcultpylpse
6. I ask them: why would a bad person kill somebody. Individual killings is pointless and it knows it.
7. a ghoul would fit such description, while bad persons are functional and fairly sensible living creatures lost of all basic concious and are trying to fulfill their relentless greed, to fill their bottomless pits of hunger which are inside of themselves
8. subverting the good elements is the main career of the negativists
9. the only murderers and kidnappers this justice system ever caught and/or got rid of or deterred has been unweary people, people who were irrational at the moment, or folks who were protesting against the system by purposely throwing themself in
10. anytime a real bad person sees the consequence of the law, they adapt, only an innocent accidentally caught in the blitsfire would be unaware of the punishments and do and don'ts of law that clearly: the real criminals would always know law as good as lawyers
11. so to have such a law system to catch criminals.. we know the result of that: not one caught, and all rats slipped, right through the giant hole in the net like Billy Bean could fit in this whole truck
12. a bad person, a real one, not the fictional one, wouldn't target individual good people, like that. That's so foolish: if they wanna do it, they wanna harm the group: taking down all the good elements piece by piece
13. the word is subvertion, of good elements: only a goofy criminal would harm individual good persons. while any criminal would know it's not worth it
: by relentlessly everyday viciously subverting the joy, the harmony, the trust, an atmosphere of mistrust, of greed, of degeneration emerge in place taking the rotten undeathly flesh one step closer to its concept of 'eternal gain'
