Civil War in China is a likable option as that place is infested with bad policies plus bastard humans anyways. What the Chinese has contributed to the world or has to offer has nothing to do with its bottom 95% population. Almost all of the jade kingdoms' achievements and inventions, plus its creative capacity and all had to do with the elites and their friends. And the bottom 95% of current population share little connection with them, if not hostility inbetween. Suppose French suddenly took over southern China through territorial expansion, most of these population would remain alive, now walking in public boasting in the loudest capacity they can (about the only capacity they possess that's closest to goodness) that they are French citizens now. While if Japan takes over, now they are Japanese, if German, now they have become Germans. By then there would be no room and time for us to request an answer from them about: "hey what happened to your Chinese identity, are you Chinese now". Their answer is expected to be something in the nature of "rubbish, shoo, you".
Never underestimate the wak is something I often remind to myself and others. These peasant class of China may be not activately holding knives against us. Soon they will if they get the opportunity. We seem to still have this incorrect and heavily congested and contaminated social notion floating around here, that the most nice is someone that's weak, when in reality it's someone that can have the power to do harm but choose not to, and precisely not someone that can't do. It's on the decision, and not on "strength level".
While there are many geniuses, creative minds, and wise thinkers and overall capable and charming people in China, the 95% of its population are in the definate-not class (DN-sub-human types). Hopefully the Chinese government (Communist Party of China) can workout a common dream with us in this great rejuvanation of civilizations. It's certain they would cooperate as soon as movies of spirited quality demonstrate to fellow intellectual minds that the truest enemy of all nations, all cultures had always been its much so called "own people". Not only has history again and again proven this to be correct, but so do the social experiments which have become prevelent and stacked to a good quantity of records.
If countries are spending billions a year on giving welfare and handouts to strangers that completely hostile to us, then we might as well better to waste them to cows and breeding stronger monkeys. The "#1" nation USA alone wastes nearly 2 trillion every year on people that are completely unrelated to them, including the evil wall street mafia gang members, by all fronts and spectrum perspectives.
The peasants of each nation are waging an active passive-aggressive war against all the founders of civilizations, the creative people, the poets, the painters, movie directors, authors, and many other. They perform their passive-aggressions under the mask of total friendship. Their trust is gained through actings usually, and seldomly direct statements like that of in elementary textbooks (direct phrases: "I am friendly"). Here are some samples how they earn trust through those mimikery and conveniently timed actings:
- spams a message condemning or cursing loudly at a murderer
- be shocked at the news story of 3 deaths in a bus crash
- dissing "other side" (ethnic, nationality, hobby club or political views) actively
- acting annoyed to any normal people
- any form of pressure
- sents out demands, but calls it talking, stalks person but calls it watching, seizes others comfort, and calls it giving advice (general malicious activities)
Let the theatre of USA from 1980 to 2014 demonstrate to all of us what the peasant mass's full capabilities are. The rapid decline of prominent individuals in United States had been so vicious that the signs are obvious even under traffic nose and LCD and neon lights. Samething has occured elsewhere too. China being a nation with much more obedient passive-aggressives and much more craft passive-aggressives, it's probably less known. Its larger intellectual-worshipper population also contribute to its lesser suffering from the rise of peasant masses, and of course-ly their assaults.
Their assaults are diverse and sophisticated in its own way. The moral criteria in their boxes sits near zero. If they can bank on police protection they will. If it's "ok" to loot, they will loot. And thanks to America's leading role in turning all states into socialism welfare-nanny-states, the peasants have learned to do much more advanced tactics. I emphasize here that their abilities have become rapidly ascended in the last 30 years. What used to be simply waiting for an opportunity to loot until it comes, now they work together in temporary teams, faking donations, and such to achieve the "eventual goal". Moreover, not all of their moves are perfectly planned or calculated (though they may yell otherwise), and sometimes they make itchy choices (choices that's not suppose to be there, but are more of result of their itchy habit thing), and it's those itchy choices that often blow up their entire mass "team"'s cover.
Let their reaction pave way to itself's doom
The peasants would probably see this article as a foul thing and declare it to others as so. But then I am a person who has invented theory of relativity II? How can that be true then.
One of the bright objective of a major civil war in China is to assist in the transition from a welfare-pro-mass state to that of a bright proper one. One in which noble people feel safe living. One that actually ensures low passive-aggression rates. Until the stabled stage, slums will exist, mass population displacements will be there. Small warlords are guaranteed none as it's no longer pre-radio state. While big warlords would be under our's planned moves. Majority of the current mass peasant population will return to doom gates finally for good, while the remaining (if things reach this result) would be restored to their former glory (or inglory): slave class.
Again we have to remind ourselves here: the number of cathedrals, pagodas, cultural sites have only rapidly diminished in the last 200 years. With this, came rise of louder shouters, unrul-ey strangers, and overwhelming flood of bigot peasant fools who put on a tremendous strain to the governments and the society itself. 83% of world's computers end up in those fiends' hands. We perscribe to an alternative: all of Aryans having computers, and few of them do.
(more to come)
+sheer+power+of+the+zergs,+++proof-case.png)