I Understand it All

            
 Russia
            


         I do see it, you see, Mayor, I understand it all.  And not sure how to name this blog post name by the way.
         The Putin government puts out a show on front, while inside thinks an opposite show.
         Foremost, while I understand it all, I will not disclose any of it in public, certainly won't be purposely doing such activities.
         Just like with National Socialist government, their wish differs from the exterior seemingly-must-be-certain acts that indicate their wishes. Aye, yes, it's different from what they show, what they feel, and also want.
         Putin wants the truth be out - the truest, most pure historical context, the most unbiased history.
         But, as they well knowingly, this cannot be done for these following reasons I am sure they all know very well by heart, at level of can-instant-recall, ye:
Firstly, showing that the story about Stalin and fight vs Germany was all wrong in WW2, or just even by not as vigurous as before. Basically not repeating the same old rhetorics that communist Russia always had told the public, would cause public panic and insecurity.  Putin's government feels a vigurous need to show the truth, however, the other force, even if blindly so, because plays a major role as well, surpresses this one - getting themselves this "clash", two thing pushing, like two walls, or tectonic plates, in their minds.  The mass panic possible from suddenly changing rhetorics, the same ol' piece of story would surely bring about, which is within their anticipation, unwanted instability in any of its region.  And any region is no good. Royalty from population is very important in this junkish modern era, led by Goldman Sacs wall street.
Secondly, I seem to had gotten a lil bit extra wordy perhaps in the last one, by the ways, so I indicate this here.  So now, the second main reason (much shorter than the first point given) is because, very similar to the first one, just like what Adolf H!tler in his MeinKKKamph has written: it's necessary for the state to uphold the interests of some, though wishing it was something different.  This is pretty much saying: if the soldiers don't listen, which firstly they needs to be satisfied with current situation and surroundings, then the.. oh wait I am getting too verbal complex here, ah, caught that disease again, so rewrite:  this is pretty much saying: if the soldiers aren't happy and content with the situation, then they will not listen, and that's no good.  This can easily be triggered of state embrasses itself or seem like an alien utterly fundamentally different from them.  Showing too much intellectualship can also do the same effect. While changing rhetorics, the stuff that was always there since the beginning and ever-since-so repeated, is something just plain not good.  Soldiers being all peasant types, prefers emotions and immediate gains, alcohol, consumption goods over spiritual needs and intellectual beliefs.  Tossing away the old rhetoric all of a sudden and say Stalin is bad, Stalin is rotten would severely damage the relationship with the peasant soldiers, wouldn't it, needless to say, right?
Thirdly, same as first and 3rd, I anticipated 3, turns out there isn't one, kinda, sorta,  and plus no matter how it's ordered, the point is to get the message across, and it's up to the person to however divide them into however many points, ye, yes. Aye, true.