On Local-Optimizer

● Those are the ones that burned their older "books".
● Algorithm local optimizer, adapts closer to local, often forgetting to save an extra copy of the original.
● To be a top supreme food chain, one that lives, rules longetively, he cannot local optimize to that extreme point, like these imp-ples.  Two copies  save would be needed, and burning of the tradition algorithm, needless to say, something of true unacceptables.
● Often a person doesn't increase intelligence, become smarter, or in more so called accurate saying, became more familiar or master-crafted at a specific task, but in reality has optimized its algorithms.
●●● Two main types of algorithm optimization exist: actual optimization, and over-local-adaptation. The later actually has generally and overall a bonus than actual optimization, forming this natural fool's temporary gold, baiting many into abandoning their older algorithms at things.  Added with forces of "shame" and laughing at others poked totally unawaringly by them,  that's how we get the course of humanity, ye, so to speaks.  Usually, both optimizations happens at the sametime, with the later being the main course meal.
●●● When one becomes more familiar with a task, so much quicker, and etc, it's due to local-optimization, this is the case true for humans, and rarily the true optimization.  Thanks to social quarrels, this excessive social competition, in a way, by that standards, yes, whoever had taken the lesser-temporary but so-much-greater long term likely were snuffed out, discriminated against, and seen as losers.  This at the time with this lens, now seem like as if they intentional, when in reality out of complete clueness and violent unaware innocence.  But then, just like the paradox-ic nature of nature, what has been has been done.  The ones who operate on proper algorithm-optimization manner has almost later come due to genetic changes and chances, rather than natural inheritance.
●●● This all of the above goes to explain so well why I am far greater in intelligence and wisdom, the overall brilliance way more than the geniuses tiptop even - it has to do with how they had all burned their codex of life, for that temporary glory (local-adaptation, temporary glory).  And they did get what they wanted, but the price they are now paying,  almost as if thousand years later, how funny eh,  ye.  And again, that's nature, matching with its fundamental nature - paradoc-xic.
●●● this over local-adaption, this excessive algorithm-local-optimization they do makes them forget the essentials and many important aspects of life that might come later on, and if come, will truly devestate them.  These ones have so locally adapted their algorithm that they've even forgot what they had forgotten! Uh ohs, not even a burned mark of the abandoned, unsaved copy of codex of life even there, in them  = p.   This whole how later they will receive excessive punishment and deterence and whatnot at the expensive of temporary baitful (luring) gain resembles much the Double X2 betting system (martingale) of casino games - it works most of the time, and this seemingly reward makes the person have wrong idea of what it actually is, some may make it very far, but eventually it will get them.  And now, in this modern society, which is filled with much scammers, misinformation, and pure chaos, mess of the publictism, the one with dragon algorithm would succeed 99.99% of time to top stages, while these ones with those pigly algorithm would at best be at top at 0.25%, while doing shaky, fairly unsuccessly 80 percent plus of the time.
● One thing to note, heavily in relation to the adjacent above paragraph/entrypoint:  the general population could still through hiding when they took a gamble and turn out bad and showing excessively off when took a gamble and turn out good to enhance their true form X5 fold at least, by general standards, estimation here.  (so in reality, a dragon-algorithm, dragon codex of life carrier person, like me, is a far superior form of life than these in all shapes and forms.  One cannot argue just because some people are better than me, therefore I am not the best - suppose we run 10,000,000 instances of the universe. Then things become visually apparant~