o

o
1goodness2

Thursday 27 September 2018

Opinion 77





1. He who is great in a team, my not perform on solo.
2. He who is excellent in solo, runs into trouble in teams.
3. From a universal perspective, the team players also have to hold a torch of contridiction for awhile.
4. The soloist optimizes by vigurously supporting self, while seeing all other as an objective means for his central goal.  This type runs into trouble for family life but would score the highest and comfortably doing so under today's academia examination.
5. Sometimes, the best way to think may be to unthink.  Thinking often under assess a certain totally missed area but would provide a gift to the requester in the brain which has the same exterior looks as the actual better-well-thought answer — like having a wrong answer on a math test, the wrong answer 'looks' just as the right one, and would result in further mislead if follow-up question proceeds, and that always happens in real life which where events stack after the next, in quicker pace than protagonist could repel.
6. Thinkers often go into arriving to a set of life directions and ways that result in their extremism.  This is a big prone of using thinking and with little intuition or instincts.  The instinctial creature would realize initially that despite greater performer in life struggles would be one that scoffs and ever strong, the actual champion would be someone that perform nearly well, has several "weaker" phases where it groans and break down in anger and so on mood showing that "weaker" sign, during that same struggle.  The reason for this phenomenom is because the "weakling" there sacrifices so to speak, we can remark it that way, small portion there, for the gains of cooperating with family and social members better.  The earlier one would be an extremist and an extremist in reality, while a champion on paper, while the actual champion is the one that seemed runner-up, and which happens: usually under that leading extremist's learing, seemed like the weakerling.  So it's been along that the true champion is one that's versatile than lethality: good in one narrow area, and that the previous champion at those scene was nothing but appear-to-be and ways of an extremist.  
7. It wouldn't take long for the extremist to later find anger in noticing something precisely wrong: some of which can turn hateful and second-guess that the other contestant must've cheated.  
8. Folks who can socialize better than others ultimately return home the prize. Those traits which bring to that final score isn't the top one by one, but is top when put together and stood to many dimensional testament of life.  The traits are also not maximum values, but are perfect values, and rather in fitting places, the right seats, not earliest, or the tallest seats, the right seats.  That's a sign of the true champion.
8.1 The above signs mentioned can be set forth in tablet stone, the signs of a true champion, which are: each trait by itself ain't the best, while together scores the top.  And the traits aren't maximus values, figures or magnitudes, but perfect values, in synchronization with each other.
9. Psychic creatures like these instabalis soft-bone small-eye vitamin-lackey cerebral hominids, will play drama, do not strength, nor agility, but psychic moves.  We know psychic moves come in forms (clothing) of the other types often and sometimes.  They are ugly, but they won't say so.  Through negligeaing, which is a good strategy, their saying, instead going directly for their ugliness, we had found this golden line lately: each cerebral have an average of 0.2-0.3% chance of going psychopath spontangeous bad person berzerk, and that's where the ugliness of them constitute from we suppose.  However, whenever one or few of them do pop to become a psychopath, nearly all of their identicals launch their psychic spells in correspondence: leaving an image as if they aren't same, henceward the psychopaths have all been identified and right there, found and arrested.  When in reality nearly all of them are exact copies (identicals) as the cerebrals they just pointed fingers to.

















No comments:

Post a Comment