if there is an interaction, there is likely control
if there is no interaction takes place, then there must be no control, unless observation faulty
things get real complex in determining who ultimately has the real control when we consider everything, everybody's goals and opinions especially, though, yet, still, not extremely complex to the point making decisions/determining impossible. This is kind've to say that the result shifts drastically with the bias we lean toward while thinking course/afloat. And doing this with absolute neutral or close enough to neutral may not be all that possible. Most of us are heavily installed with pre-inserted bias, and most of them we ain't even aware of, nor can possibily toss away. Anywho here is the main points of this blog post piece: (and yeah plus, the idea of control means it involves mimimal 2 parties, and at the most fundamental most simplelistic views, we can't really decipher who is controlling who, it's just like the story with the bell hitting another bell, it could be said that both hit it, or one hit the other, either one - something entirely debatable subject right there then becomes to, yeh) (though we could still get something highly beneficial, anew out of this adventure, so to speaks, yeh, that is true, that is correct)
We know that the women are mostly parasetic entities/creatures.
They mooch off of men, the only hard workers, and runs in conspiracy alligence fashion about the "I do make-up, and thus we do work type of deal"
Aye, it is true, something we could recall, (at the above). And even more true is how that women have ruined men.
The reason Saskat freeloaders (also known and wanted be known by Saskats as Jews) manage to come and stick to men so easily has particular to do with the existence of women - they had opened up the chances for Saskat to "land" so to speaks there through opening/dugging of their own holes into men.
They weaken men.
They turn humanity and thus civlizations itselves into smudder, weakened sauce.
They change men for the worst, they ruin men.
Consider more, let's, while keeping, raise our un-childish awareness so to speak, a little. The more we ponder about this proper stance, in right approach and posture, not the taught or manipulated-given ways, then the more we realize how true everything posted here is. Questions get raised including: is it just natural, is it right, and is it just automatically should be assumed yes and right so quickly so, dismissed of any inquiries or second thought, of any at all, that our urge to like them or "romance" them must be right? And it's out of question, rejected inquiry automatically that they had trained us somehow to behave in this way and this is exactly how a person would feel under pretty potent spells, manipulation, thus total control? - makes more sense more and more the more we look into thos research topic.
Let's get philosophical and professional with the whole thing - our enemy are right to us, been around us the whole time, getting away with free loading for centuries. Remember this folks: someone under total control is not seeing the "control" visually, ain't feeling nothing of that nature, nothing about it. And isn't it much more sense, like things add up better, connect with one another observation more if we consider that maybe the women gender is actually a specie that resemble us, and has somehow hijacked us, made us "sexual" so that they could mooch off, and that the idea of human specie is nothing but we operating still under and within their mastery control? Hehe, something to think/consider a bit, good curious question, ain't it? Ye'arr
women are creepsters, our very enemies, the greatest opponent of humanity been around us for all this time, spooky. kinda ultra creepy too, yeh, yes, I knows right~
Supplementary summary points:
- women are running this show together, conspiracy fashion, all on the same stuff, all pretending that make-up is considerable work and is difficult, thus considerable to be equal to the work men are labored with, all while also pretending not support and conspired with one another
- women have ruined men by doing this. the reason we have this national ongoing degeneration and heavy deterioration of the spirit, moral values and so on is particularly due to women's doings - they had dug holes in men that they could exploit, but this had opened gates to new uninvited guests - the secret society puppet masters
- thus women have ruined effectively both humanity and civlizations itself
- isn't it worth thinking at least, and also make very much sense that women are another specie actually that highly resemble men and managed to hijack men and brainwash them? notice how cruel they treat to any boys whom were completely within their palms, that behave in a certain way, in ways that are not "obedience" to their orders, refusive to their teachings?
- women has installed boys with things that they could use to control, which is ultimately to mooch off with. And the boys that are not type that would accept thos installation had been long ago rid off, in various ways (usually indirect) (example: not selecting them as mates, and of course, like their usual habit, casts it out as they don't want to do it. Anything wrong a women does is due to men, or other things, and any men's achievement is due to theirs. They are never admitted to any fault, and theya re always innocent and "fragile". These are a leech specie that somehow got attached to men and hijacked them since centuries ago. Aye, women, factually, are our masters, they control our minds, and thus controls our whole)
- the fact that all work, and real actual work are done by men gives further consolidation to the given posted points
- run an Intelligence test on women, they all score rediculous amount. But run a test on how much facts they know about boys/guys' behaviors, they are all phDs
#controlMasters
No comments:
Post a Comment