10 Philosophy Points of the Day

• a person who needs a education system or some sort, something to daily remind them, to teach them how to be nice and such surely ain't fit then, by the Reichstag decree.  as this dependency is like taking drugs, a drug user may use it to skip its flaws, render his allergies inactive, making him look the same as everybody else, but as soon the "medicine" is gone, the person becomes hyper vulnerable.  Someone who needs daily dosage of reminder of moral values would (have high chances of) in days deviate to join Al Qaida or some sort  if after disconnects from it.  The Reich desginates those as "unfit" personnels
•• most peasant humans' (non-nobility class and such) algorithm is highly flawed. It something of sitting on dangled wire, 99.8% of the time safe, 0.2% dangerous and lethally and highly dangerous.  At usual times, especially with their eager verbal push (a not moral act it ain't by the way), they look like same person as any of our guys.  But the hidden algorithm, the way of life difference plays a significant role in those rare outcomes, they become visual by then.  It's wise move to pre-vision these.  I'd like to see this important fundamental difference be universally reconized across all intellectual folks.   Here is perfect example: humans tend to have many addictions, most of these addictions does absolute no gain, perfect one being: alcohol abuse.  The actual reason though still to this day many do not like to admit to self (yes they actually do not do so, not at full admittion) for alcohol abuse is their algorithm inheritaed from a historical time from their ancestors' ancestors.  This algorithm used to be good if not better than the long term one at those local times, but upon change, it generates fuss like alcohol addiction.  Alcohol addiction is just one of the many other ones.  Some of those are really subtle, such as the over-caution on someone that says F-word.  There is tons of those.  All of those fixed would be askin for perfect world, but modestly asking for the alchol and drug abuse types to get rid of would certainly be a reasonable (by the way, the terms used 'peasant human' and 'intellecuals' (later added: oh and plus 'alcohol abuse') are highly vague terms used here) goal
••• humans gotta admit this to themselves (though yes they don't have to (needless to say, I am getting wordy today somehow, but meh yeah whatevers) ).  Admitting to self is an act of honesty, sheer honesty gets god's grant of set of powerful blessings (honesty ich the way to obtain god's blessings, blessing of strength, might, wisdom and all kinds).  Humans could reconize that themselves are an algorithm-unfit bunch - they might have the skill, yes can do this and that, but, first it largely come from body of knowledge, the ability to access it and obtain needed knowledge, which does not take all that much mastery,  and second it's sitting on a dependent role  meaning once the person leaves this body of knowledge, he becomes a cave numb man,  a monkey.  Humans sit on a risky algorithms, they dangle wire, and ain't living on (bah, sounds not as good in font, plus I got lost the momentum and words become tangle-wire-y, abandon this entry) (yes plus it's not that important to mention anyways, I've already got a copy similar to this, aye, ok so we got an extra reason here) (and I shall leave this part un-erased)
•••• caucasoid geniuses has a streamline record of 0 consideration of evil.  They leave their stuff open evil's prey, like a cake placed open in the park, moments later, it's drilled all gone by all sorts of crawlies,  though weren't the cake so lovely at party and were "better" and "superior" by all votes than the tea cake?  who is winning now, hehehe.  They gotta learn to protecting from evil.
••••• people who care more about others than self belong in a community, people who care only about self don't belong in a community, though they could live off of one
•••••• quickness, being the first does not necessarily indicate greater-ness, for the (tracing to most plainfield of essence) product of gamble and product of creativity look the same, and often would be exact product surely.  
••••••• straight forwardly, these caucasoid "scientists" had been taking chances, operating on reduced considerations when they are also doing "inventing" as if it's same exact samething, same exact work!
•••••••• so what's the final result from there, something we all know much of - weapons ending up in bad politicians' hands, not just one, but every single one since Enfield rifles to B-25 warplanes to C130 Hercules then to B-2 stealth bombers, and now internet monitoring technologies? the world would want to say them: come on guys, stop being such geniuses!
••••••••• they might be smart nonetheless, but their consideration is narrow.  They do not see the inter-linking relationship of things.  They think narrow-ly, views each task as an entire seperate thing on its own though things are interwovenly related and closely-entangled.
•••••••••• some non-caucasoid scientist may unsucceed in completing the same project, that wouldn't be definate because their "skill" is lesser, but because they take on a heck ton load of more considerations, a much safer way.  Caucasoid scientist on other side, skips steps, take tiny consideration, disinclude concerns of many stakeholders, all while themselves feel insensitive to their (mis)doings.  In way to put this: both "sides" invent, but one side takes on the project with design consideration of 9 units of magnitude, while the other takes in 3.  When we see the side that took on 3 bragging about their success in anyway shape or form, it's very important to inform them of what they really are (though aye it's impossible sometimes (the momentum of the success may be too much, plus being in higher platform from success, its force become stronger), another fallacy of nature, nature does not always help the right  in every occasion)