Lizards VS Mammals

Lizards tend to be more realistic than mammals.

Mammals have bloodlust berserk mode activation ability (strong ones do).

Lizards are far more philosophical.

Lizards have keen observation skills - their way, approach to observation gives them the edge in knowing the inter-relations and essence of things.  They observe the right way

Mammals are loud observers, and lousy.  They rapid around, cannot calm down, be calm or being calm without discomfort somehow.

Rapidness of mammals help in many areas from reproduction, metabolish rates, boosted energy and strength, while creates a void in lack of patience, losing the ability to observe properly, and ask philosophical questions the right way and the right ones.

Lizard's cold-bloodedness renders them unsocial (or is this the other way around), preferring self-voyage, recluse lifestyle, and so on.

Mammals being social creatures have harder time getting detailed work done as too many teammates are commonly present, they exert an influence, contacts unexpectedly, moves suddenly around, disrupts careful thinking so often, thus preventing refined observations from being done.

The top tier, most advanced, most sophisticated lizards know so much philosophies that if they ever manage to communicate a portion of it to humans, they'd be so amazed and shocked.  And those mighty lizards achieve this without technology or books, or parental guidance.

Social-ness of mammals create small gains which happen frequently and bring big disasters which are rare.  The cows themselves believe no humans are strong enough to kill them.  Most refuse to believe until the very last second of proof - by that time they are stunned than more so in normal enough state to conduct dodge manuvers.  Every other mammals have some kind form of this associated onto them.  Social are like parties, they make unecessary competition arise - where does drinking competition come from - when crazy friends get together.  The nerds don't drink nor party in same fashion, they compete in unecessary video game scores or in-game achievements instead.  Crazy competitions are a natural phenomenom (a spawn of social-ness) as long as people are socializing - even kings and queens are no escape to this.  Didn't the royal families over induldge in alcohol and luxury became, no one was willing to go serious statement about funding a 175,000 strong army?

The bloodlust charge ability of mammals can make them able to pump out a turbo boost - very important in wildlife combat, and is in sports in general.  

Mammals tend to employ local algorithm adaptation.

While lizards tend to not adapt.  They kind've can't, they sorta have inability in doing that, which actually turns out saves them from those disaster and weakenings associated with it, I think.

Mammals like to go qui-qui-quick quick, and even quicker, on everything, and at everywhere.  That's their tendency.

Lizards like to stay still, and be on motion in steady motion style, a "slower" (very based on opinion word) (relative perspective used therein there) pace than the mammals.  

         It's important to clarify hereon that the "slower" is not really the same thing slower, but something of bigger consideration.

Mammals lose at all wisdom, philosophy, and life dynamics competitions.

Lizards may miss many victories and fail seize opportunities 'cause they can't go turbo mode, they don't have bloodlist turbo mode nor their own versions.  Their best call is to be prepared - have prediction, gather info, simulate outcomes.

Lizards have power to track others really well, something mammals dull in this area.  They can track objects, life forms, things, and natural elements' tendencies and pattern of change.

Lizards have astonding memory.  They never ever forget due to fade of time.

Lizards' eyes sees 19 shades.  This makes up for their lack of dog's nose

(and more to come)