- generally can be easily mislead, one of their weakness, and it's a major one, is that they can be altered in principle and road by events, manipulations (direct manipulations, that's even easier), misunderstandings and probability/chances even. While take rhinos, cows, any of those "farm animals", they do better than humanoids in that genre, generally (not including special genetic or actual Aryan humanoid geno types) so to speaks
- their lack of sense ties together with their lack of moral perserverence - no creature almost in mammal category does it worse than the humanoids in keeping moral concious, and knowing what is right and what is wrong. Despite its intelligence, its sense, the mechanisms, or compartments in the brain suppose for taking care of warning when going out of moral principles and values, is tiny - and its intelligence makes up nothing but more faulty presumption and preception of self that itself is also good at moral principle keeping - oh, what a delightful combo to have, these two
- very disbalance in body, much discourse and disjointship, and disunity as well inbetween/amongst its organ parts - sometimes their brain goes overcharge, and the person doesn't care about other body components, resulting in mishealth. While other types brain goes undercharge, and the stomach takes over as supreme dictator - ordering everybody else to just eat and eat until goes super fat and overweight
- the above are not "accidents" or "just is", that's what these gluttonous roaches tell as part of their defense mechanics to achieve the same "gains" and "struggles" many other creatures also try to achieve or obtain. It's about survive, and talking like as if they understanding world philosophy, geometry and such is just one of their way to achieve the other goal - aye, just to survive, no different from a roach finding bread in a cabinet
- and the car "accidents" are also not accidents, these are mistakes, error, misfits. To be a good graceful civilization, we naturally praise excellence. And if we were to do that, surely these un-excellent and un-un-canny nonsenses would be marked as misfits or disqualificists
- generally are of the manipulator/talker type. They do not excel at sports - the ones who do, are definately not the manipulator type (just physically anatomy-wise not possible) - like the proverb says, "a small snake may be venomous, a too large snake surely has no toxin teeth"
- the small ones are usually the bitter/vile/roach/leech type, watchout for the them, and examine them very carefully - to this day they survived and reaching this prominence and "likableness" by the supreme state authority due to a combination of mistakes, errors, luck, chances and their manipulation lies
- their eyes are very poor - so poor that they think everybody else has the same eye sight (relatively to almost all other creatures except a few sleepy retarded ones who climb trees and eat bad veggies - leafs (and not the chewy yummy grass)
- thinks self is so good because someone else invented a phone or some other electronic device - they are no different from a monkey given a palace
- claims is this ethnic category or that genre - all of which are myth. They do this to play innocent, again, as part of their manipulations, as mentioned
- true evil does not reveal self as true evil, if someone looks very innocent, maybe we should inquire just once to be sure. Oh, and thanks to their flawed execution of barring out inquiry so vigurously - I know that they have something to hide - if they fear and try to stir away or prevent in anyway investigation into their validness, their true work and legitimacy
Ducks:
- they are master of the psychology, this short sentence abbreviates and summarizes it up so well
- and exactly like master of psychology, any master of such discipline would really be appearing as not a master of psychology - that's how psychology works, it is kind've a purple-colored deception based, sorta dark I would say, yeah, disciplinary
- through appearing as not an expert on psychology, does these psyducks manage to achieve so much - notice how they are not farm animals somehow - for a good particular reason - they managed to master the power of language - their quacks does enough to prevent them from being treated or mistreated like chickens or snorky pinky pigs
- and specifically their timing of the chosen quacks are just done superbly well for a bird of its brain size, ain't it, yeah that's true, isn't it, amen
- to many observers, other participants, players (creatures) of this world, their neighbors too might think ducks are just "ordinary creatures", but the more we observe them, the more I realize that it's actually the opposite of that - these are extraordinary creatures who have mastered the art of psychology, somehow, and are great language masters (though can't pronounce words, a simple quack and few here and there seals the deal already)
- to the best observers, such as dragons, or maybe lions too, sooner or later they realize: wait a minute, this creatures, these creature (types) are definately the psychology-based, and certainly have great mastery in that field
- smarter than most humanoids, at least definately more excelled in that psychology field than the general humanoids.
- as for question how does it know all this, is it learned, is it taught, is it understood since beginning, this amazing topic deserves to be a mass writing topic of (on) its own. In brief, I will provide this answer: ducks gain this through their ancestral experiences, which led them to reach that point, and that excellence in that field had never met any cancellation ordeals or events (if a creature finds certain abilities to be untossable and must be kept - it will be kept under normal circumstances and conditions)
- psyducks cross the roads better than most other small creatures, and even creatures with much bigger brains than they are - how come they know how to cross road? They are smart! And so good of master of psychologies that to this day almost all general humanoids (the low tier type in particular) still thinks they are "just ducks"
No comments:
Post a Comment