o

o
1goodness2

Wednesday 18 March 2015

Personal Philosophy in Combatting Illuminati (and Anti-Semitism) (metaphor)















     




   (later added:  this post began from immediate reaction        (immediate reflex popped)
   from sceneries of the same ol' self-serving & imposed         (triggered circurm-stancial events)
   righteous peasant crowds which makes history look            (different realm, phased in, enter has)
   repeats itself)  (fonts perform limited in prescribe that
   feeling, also the stance, the realm oneself was imagined
   to be.  Audience and readers who can later enter that
   realm would gather the entirety info, as ish in my hope)


With the wind, confront all.

Gather entire energy of encyclopedia.

Consider every bushes, each sand, any tails.


The codex is of right.

Humanoids' psychic nature are spoken less by goyims than the word "do not know, I is".

Motions that seek changes, drive.  The goys often drive another.




Counter | Reflex | Ortho | Azure | Vashj | Geevok

Taunt taunt win, win taught taunt.  The goyim's sequlching greed pairs with its earlier layers.

Goyims lay psychic landmines, every step of the way.  What's uniquely different from ordinary deceivers (and scoudel thugs) come in their rushfulness, disturboa loudness, the formality.  They be and been laying landmines while raging, while tearing, while distressing, while dramatic eventing.  Unlike the standard thiefs, their psychic shadowsteps happen on true events, than pretends.

As long as one maintains that the sky is above, clouds entines, cafe opens, bank permits.  We got it fair and square, equal and balanta (word morphed from balance, pronounced similarly) for all.


                        FROM A UNIVERSAL EYE — STANDARD TEXTBOOK SCENARIO
Type 0356-1  (The reasonable angry stranger)
A sells stories.
B made stories.
 A defends people from B.
 People returns support.
   B doesn't arrive to make point. 
   B appears increasingly guilty.

[[ If you are seeing this scenery, visit doctor to know that and hear 
this diagnosis:  B is actualy innocent, by 75% portionality, whereas 
it's the A the problematic candidate, by 47% portionality, in estimation.
This sight means the observer is under influence of person A's party's
sway (the characters which appeared as people were its conspirators;
fellow dramatizers, aligned together) and in heavy dosage of.  This 
diagnosis is proper.  Any wording different than the above on describing
this scenario is work (undoing) of the person A frauds.  Since all observations
(which can only be gathered during the obs stage) of observational stage time 
being differ than its appearance upon the relevation stage. ]]
 







Reasoning must come with profound self-created (so to speak)
wisdom, or it's garbage savageness well disguised.

A person under full control cannot see this sight, they see differ worlds as if.

While our candidates under partial control should be known of this principles.


These days, it's often seen, though not intrepreted and judged proper,
that a very large group (a crowd) of commoners must be right if they
are speaking loudly (yelling; which they often claim) of a right and high lvl moral ideal and doing no
criminal actions or behaviors.  Though by the criminal code of eluneman
knights, not only should their reasoning be original (gone through self, which
means through self's thinking processes, the mind, at least once), but
matching to requirement width of consideration must also take place.  
So it's the consideration wide, and original wisdom that's the requirement.
Not either one fan be missing.  While the action and behavior of yelling
one-sided insults which each hold moral grounds and have factual evidence
and make sense goes under category of abuse, of an already zerg established
notion; notional structure; notional-structural paradigm. (poetic signalling herein,
in the last part)

Piles on end of humanoid scums, though however this seemed right
as had few points, good ones mostly copied but had great accessories
surrounding remains belonging to lamerism: a fat pudge proving its worth
by its luckified situations.  Yesterday the pudge (whether skinny or chubby)
had gemstones, silks, expensive carpets. Today they have electronics, DVDs,
softwares and royal level know-ledges.

As shall be always: if it's not panda, it's wrong opinion, words, replies, throws, or commentations.































No comments:

Post a Comment