1 + 1 = 2

Let's do some fun math, shall we.

With regarding to the numbers list in ascending order (the term ascending order does sound like some cult fashioned jargon doesn't it,  anywho, let's continue), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9,  let's switch 2 with 3, 4 with 5, 6 with 7 and 8 with 1, then we get the new list: 8, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7, 6, 1, 9

Now, let's do math from there!

8 + 2 = 5
5 - 3 = 3
3 * 2 = 7
6 - 5 = 2
2 + 5 = 6
7 - 3 = 5

Confused enough yet?  There exists good reason why I chose to do this, the purpose is partially for bringing to this philosophy key proverb: Did you know a person that never done math before, a new math learner to this number order can do a better job than most of us?  Now, so, that does seem absolutely to be the case. But why exactly is that?  Shouldn't someone who is more familiar with numbers be still far better than someone who had just touched the numbers?

Well, it seems that anyone who has already learned something have a tougher time learning something a distorted, a variation, version of anything already-learned.  So then, the noun learned should come into question: it's not really learned, as in gained something, but gained something at the expense of something else also, isn't it.  The something else here being later adaptation abilities, so to speak, isn't this right and correct!

In conclusion, true learning, the true-true one, happens when folks gain something without any losses in any other areas, and not this trade-type pf deals - where one gains a new "skill" at the expense of losing other abilities.  This leads to the question, can true-true learning happen?  My answer so far to this question is this, but too costly to go into perfect quality of it, but a good level quality of true-true learning can be done, and it pays off so well.  I myself had always been a personal user of this method of learning - always learn it the actual learn-way, and not at costly expenses of shortening of other areas of abilities.  When I learned math, I made sure so it connects well with philosophy and logic and various other components of my mind.  When I learning computer science programming, same case went on - I made sure it connects well with other areas of studies, made tons of metaphors and connections with nature throughout the way.  These things stack, and like anything that can stack on stack on stack, the end result award can be rather shockingly high magnituted - very high amount of reward.  I call this, a strand node of the  exponential increase effect (type).

Again, this connects well with the earlier post I had done: humanoids make the mistake of not questioning their question enough, but over-concentration are placed on getting the solution.  Similarly, in these instances, in the instance of learning, they only think about what to learn and how to learn it better, but not how to overall-ly learn better and could there be better ways of memorizing, learning something.  Again, they focused overly much on doing the task, but not the initial procedure, which is methods and approach strategies to finishing the task.

As for how come most humanoids have this habit, well, I suppose it's because of their pigly nature.  After all, most are birth defects, and most also refuse to admit.  I especially despise them, not 'cause they are birth defects, but they are hyper reluctant to inquire into that possibility - truly a vallain, and crappy type of behavior. They inheritated that trait long time ago from a birth defect, not from their agile parents. And since it's been working fine for them, they never really lost it.  Of course, until recent times, that's where they've seriously bumped into a stallmate with time and fate, had come to face a brick wall that's blocking (their progress) and refuses to move.  With the coming of the new social order, the ones reluctant to change out of their nutty pigly thinking behavior will be washed away by nature, like a clam whose calcium shell isn't too good against the new sea water anymore.  And for ones that have adapted to demanding changes quickly enough, they will only be given some more time until their eventual doomsday.  All creatures are born to perish one day, and some in a crappy situation, and some others in a luxurious sort've way.  But none the less, all creatures, the moment they are set to be alive, a clock is brutally stranded onto their neck that ticks each second by a second, each hour by an hour, leading to each one's doomsday time.  That's life's meaning, it is to struggle like a retard with this rough treatment, but liking it at the sametime.