Alright guys, it's time for that time of the year, the time of the year where I release bunch of my own scientific findings that are guaranteed real. I shall not put up solutions, the actual detailed-enough explainations for each finding, but you all can come and try to prove it your own way. Good luck out there, science-fans and science-loving folks:
These have been proven by my own researches:
- speed of light varies, it is not a constant
- speed of light gains wavelength length from increased speed, and its wavelength decreases from decreased speed
- light is particles that travel in wave fashion of detectable signal strength level (has to be a similar enough shape to a wave)
- light is made up of perhaps thousand trillions of (10^16 + ) photons travelling in that wave fashion
- light that don't travel in wave formation do not get detected by our eyes or other similar light (which are really in reality light wave) detection instruments
- light is released from any natural physical phenomenom where the photons comes in the wave formation, it can be from oscallating any type of photom-releasers, photon-releasers releasing in wave formation themselves (molecule vibration chain wave motion), or whatever other types of cause there may be
- photons orbit around small particles (another relative term) such as atomic neucleus, protons perhaps, and electrons, they get released through collisions or loss of gravity, or induction effects
- a proton is a near elastic particle when hitting other protons and particles of same category. While hitting photon, it behaves differently
- the current standard model of the humanoids, 4 forces - gravity, strong nucleus, weak nucleus, and electromagnetism can be portrayed as 1 fundamental force(s) (pun here) and 3 other natural phenomenoms. Each of those 3 are more so a local common effect arised from existence of gravity itself. Much like air pressure, they are local, and highly associated with the participants and actors, and thus are of natural phenomenom, not a force itself. There is only 1 single fundamental force of the universe and that is gravity. Really, guys, stop picking weird numbers, can the number 4 really be the answer to a real fundamental question? No wonder I am far superior in brainpower, just kidding. (me getting arrogant here, but you guys get my point =]) (who wouldn't be having this tone if they turn out actually solved most answers regarding to nature's laws) (no offense intended, more sort've a rhetorical speech part).
- everything is physical, for chemical at the most fundamental scope becomes physical, and everything is infinity. Here is the history of the universe: (its origin) From infinity, we get 1, for there are 1 word to describe it, and from there, we get 2, for now we have two numbers. And from there, we get three, for we now have three numbers. And so on and so on, reaching infinity again. The universe self-justifies, it is an oxymoron, a paradox within a paradox. There exists no end, and yet has ends. There exists no limit, and yet has limits. That's what this universe exactly is. If you never figured this out, then likely you do not know how she actually thinks of you. Good thing is that I figured this out, but then, since the universe is an oxymoron, what benefit does it actually get me? Not supreme power or incredible strength instantly - but absolute no reward - and that's also the answer to the fundamental questions regarding the universe - it's a giant paradox.
- All meanings justify itself, regarding to the most fundamentals of the universe. While most homo sapien type of humanoids' beliefs are justified by lies they programmed to tell to their own brain. While they had done the utter dismoral and indecent by high virtues, they do not receive punishments for that sheer dumbness unless there exists a high virtue court to act out so - to give them the hammer. Such is, again, the nature of the universe - there is never truth, only close-enough truth and closer-and-closer truth. Everything is as dismeaning as filths themselves, and yet very meaningful, highly dependent on the viewer, all while the viewer constantly is reminded that it all depends on the reality. Here I am, typing this all up effortlessly, already miles ahead of the current entire so called science community combined together, and is it rewards they actually wish to give me for this actual achievement? I know it's not, for they are no different from imposters who are still stuck on security island 1, and using their rhetoric-blahblahs about themselves being on security island 3 as part of their dark intent miserable and anquished agenda for serving security island 1. Truly, has the science community ever become so filled with imposters and utter hijacker roaches. Even more of an irony! An major irony: how that the toughest questions regarding to science had been solved by me, and yet me having difficulty solving the most utter should-be microscopic problems, such as these hijacker roaches. These permanent ever-so-sticky glues shall receive the greatest answer of all - the justice hammer from high heavens. May your days be Glorious-leo, and New-age Newton, my friends.
As for the details to the mechanisms of the events, how often does each occurence happen and so on are not included in this. I do not know much of it as of yet, and doubtful they can be known further, since restrictions of nature disallow those investigations / inquiries.
Note: any material with broken sentence please tell, as I rarily review my typings, and type them up in 1 quick speedy session (reviews rarily take place, and no edit usually happens, (the key backspace rarily gets touched) )
Edit taken: March 20, 2015 - Friday - 8:52pm EST
Edit taken: March 20, 2015 - Friday - 8:52pm EST
No comments:
Post a Comment