What is real?

If real is really real, then how come speed of light travels that fast compared to all of us.  Is it because they are fast, set to be that fast, or we are set to be that slow.  Hmm, despite how seemingly those types of question answered should technically provide the successful goalpost-reacher some kinds of award. I had already achieved it and actually got less award than the ones who didn't even answer the question correctly. So then, is everything a fallacy.  Well, looks like the investigation into the truth whether reality is real is also a fallacy, as in short - there can be no such actual investigation taking place.  The reason for that I had formulated goes as follow: if actual investigation of reality is taking place, then it must be completely subjective-independent, meaning devoid of any bias.  But then since bias cannot ever be fully erased, that means any investigation done by me or seemingly done by me or anything of that nature cannot be the actual investigation, but a close-enough (and non-real version) of the same action/task.  The investigation itself, this act should have no intent, purely of baseless desires or wishes, but then each one of my investigation into reality contains intent and wish-to-be-filled-and-answered-to, forming vivid contridictions.

So then, fallacy is the action of investigating reality itself, and itself also self justifies itself, so then, the universe by that logic and reasoning steps, technically is a fallacy within a fallacy.  Is the universe really a fallacy?  Yes. The great thing, and very interesting here is that the statement right before (not directly stated) is a fallacy, which describes the earlier logic trial, how miraculous and wonderful!  The universe is truly a loop within a loop, within a loop - when we go further, there'd be more loops, and no ends.  Any end is a relative stopping place, a restriction, generated by laws of nature, and held by invisible matters which come from same origin as the object being acted upon.  In reality, there seems to be no actor, and no correspondor - everything is simutaneously in a way  - we only see a main object, and a off-side (sidekick) object because we ourselves favor some things over the other - we have subjectism and bias.  No matter how much one tries to explain and portay self as bias-less, in reality, there can be no purely bias-less creature or person.  And that, is the wonderful nature of the universe.  I hope all living and non-living organisms understand what I say.  But I know you guys won't all do, yet I am still saying it, having that hope.  And that, again, my friends, is another fallacy within a fallacy.  A great achievement I had accomplished, yet no reward, and what does it actually do, not too much immediately - definately far lesser than the presumed or the defined-by-logic reward amount.