The Caucasian Generalis Studied

This post we speak about the worth-to-note trait of the caucasian males in this hemisphere whichio especially we draw focus on.  The type we primarily focus on herein is the "geeky" types: specifically in clearerfication: ones fairly learned, has read histories, fair knowledge, keeps up-to-date and track world events, has some ideas of world war 2 related and/or similar history, not the most stylish and street fashionable handsome chap, knows a few thing or two about fixing machines, computer hardware knowledge and components of a car, for example.

Eastern European or Native Scottish or Scadenavian countries are far better in this area, the above "negative" traits mentioned. Those score high in those.

These are the worthy-noting traits of those caucasian generabalis:

(now, firstly, none of these are easy detectable of coursely)

— goes sticking to overwordiness almost as a natural tendency, a habit.  The excessive roundabout wording does not get the job done as well as a good metaphor or direct pinpoint strike straight talk.  With them trying this hard often at going word after word, readers' really get deceived it's a sign and doing of an superior intelligence

— much and a lot a lot of over-complication - they could inflate an A to B scenario to the A's desire to accomplish its need to reach B which will be fulfilled by its standard means - big, inflated, like their boney nosey face I suppose

— sometimes, they say the looks of a person is extension of its personality and tendencies (traits), let it be strengths, weaknesses, and flaws.  These caucasians generabalis seems to like putting everything in neutral tone and perspective.  After assessment, we deemed it to be very bad, as something of shouldn't-copy probably should be dealt with (described) a rejectful tone throughout, not a neutral descriptive sitting there and letting it just go type of tone.  Once the person is slightly dazy and drunk, which happens very common, aka all the time, then how could one tell whether self liked it or not and would proceed to copy or not copy?

— saying things in utter neutral tone no matter the subject and topics may indeed render them as if being so mighty god and observant, able to understand all, looking down to observe and stay calm to things, in reality indeed come from their lack of tasteful vibrancy

— uses a collosal volumn of negative story, self-scare, visual delayma and such in order to (achieve the) slow down one's wanted metabolism rate or to bring enthusiasm to a halt.  Seems all as though an external force like such is all that is required to need

— has/carries the "momentum" (it's almost like / kinda embedded in them) of catching onto something - stretching their forehead and nose too ahead of rest of face to get/obtain something looking as if.  Well, they do seem as if often like immediately taking what's out there as input, with too quick of an in-take bite of the mind.

(the above observation r probably world exclusively new, the firsto)

(this post was typed in nocturnal mode and plus environments)

(these sure being differences, well, are these weaknesses or strength, by each we examine, or are these absolute weaknesses or absolute strengths)

Summary Points (Abbrieva version)

— circles around a point, does not get to it

— patients of excessivism overcomplicatism

— prone to learn bad things, this is done without self aware of large concious.  They may copy bad things and unable to get them out of hand is due the flat tone usage on all subjects, whether should be dealt with rejectful attitude or ones that deserve participation appraisal

— the total almost scarily dangerous (ultra potential danger and risk) way of describing things (total flat tone) (appearing as if really calm) often make them look far superior than anyone (far far far superior)

— external scare needed to affect internal wanted slowdowns

— bites in info in too fast, they seem to chunk down what appears in front of them, and cannot spit out (rarily rejecting; giving a straight direct oppose) - to function as the same, they do this accepting and converting into some morphed form from the original data inputs.  (perhaps that's why their living involves/has so much sarcasms) (sarcasm does good work of neutralizing an unwanted input mushy dough that's already taken-in) (sarcasm, an extension and manifestation of attempts at removing certain seen sights, the attempts brings the action of neutralizing to function as removal)

(pardon for later added additional point as thought up any, forming contradicta with the title of this section)

Proverb of the Day:

"Go with the flow of nature"