o

o
1goodness2

Monday, 28 July 2014

The Moral Tiers





    
      
        




•  those that are ill are morally most ill
  •  thieves being essentially much much mediocre versions of witch doctors steals wealth in its mediocre manner in contrast
     •  the mediocreness serves as a net performance loss, but gives a safe lever for big unsafeties - overall being mediocre at stealing is not exact a total net lesser
        •  while thieves steal for theifery reasons, the illness performs its immoral acts for illness reasons
          •  about the lowest of the low are those that are ill.  Can illness reasons be reasons?  Is a harmful purpose or action out of illness considerable as a purpose?
             •  the immortal beings, such as the dragonkins makes the top list, for they are distant from all sins and vibrations of corruption.  They top best premium mortals on the moral chart
                •  witch doctors' tremendous power amplifies their evil appearances.  They at least function within logic and elegant reasoning, and had to achieve the position through qualifications, unlike the street peddlers and lowlife thiefs
                   •  preception can be deceived, beware of thiefs disguised as middle class or normal beings.  This chart refers to the actuality of reality
                     •  the moral tiers combined with ability tier shows a great portion of the whole picture.  Witch doctors are smarter than most men, thiefs are smarter than average man.  Thiefs, imps, goblins, witch doctors and the whole lot of it achieve their goals by first potraying self as much weaker or equally skilled.  Fate would ultimately hand victory to the moral people - the injustice would be crushed by the justice; and the immorals would be defeated by the morals.  This ultimate result would be brought by the moral ones' ability to unite and the capacity to lend and borrow trust (and not greater (independent) skill of righteous as many would think)





                                                                     • • •  •   •   •  • • • 
             
              


No comments:

Post a Comment