The best deceivers has got us tricked so much so that we think they are legits and we are the invalids or lesser valids.
Things in life are much similar to those in Poker - it's difficult to win through bluffing on someone with triple diamond ace squadron with royal flush battalion 360
The famous serial "killer", Ted Bundy, I don't think he is bad, not at all. Far greater than Dick Chaney, Rumsfeld and Bush, had killed hundred folder greater numbers - and interestingly it's all men, Afghan men.
A wiseman of today has gotta know that life is a paradox - to get things done, one doesn't even have to know the process actually - didn't birds get newborn generation of birds not through understanding process of this and that, but just "did it", right?
And thinking abstractly guaranteed to yield good thinking results, for life itself is abstract - every sight is a short summary of the actual thing - and the actual thing has much more data - sight seeing [is] abtract seeing/touring.
People (the average level citizen) are so damn shortsighted and slightest unaware of certain things - they seem to have absolutely no pre-existing library box, so to speak, of what a King or proper authority's doings would be - when the boys and gals are put to those places and are ascended 1 grade after the other, by a very strict and overly concrete iron 1 year algorithm - didn't that, and shoudln't that had ran definately enough bell? It's obvious it's a prison, don't even try to evade thinking - and guess what, now it's gotten real obvious how wrong they were; and what was really true and right. Had they rebelled since beginning (which they would had they not been stu-pid), then things would be better now - I think right now is a good time to term the important S-word as the definiation given. I hope less of our close associates, our dear comrades get drowned by the sheer ---pids
The sentence "so and so makes more than I make in a year" is so scoudel, if spoken said by a (include possible) scoudel. There are a few points here: firstly the comparison if a single swarmling to a type of humanoid far different elevation, level and type is invalid to begin with. Secondly, you never make if you are from America, swarmling, enough is enough, laziness is your priority over persuit of happiness and enjoyment of seeking of challenges, I presume. Lastly, a valid sentence would be "so and so makes more than 4000 of us swarmling together in a year", now then that would be a proper comparison - as you types are the numerical, while that person is a different genre, correct?
No comments:
Post a Comment