Money, something everybody who is reading this has probably. Some have more than others, while few has a dysfunctional amount of it. Money should be taken as fine, however its way it's being used and the laws and rules that regulate or guide it so to speak causes/makes it to be a demonic plagueful substance. At locations where money is often used, there is definate problems - at least some by all normal perspectives. Just like an item or substance, money too follow the same underlying fundamental works. Functions come from laws, and the laws shape the behavior and traits of the substance - laws define and give the traits to the substances it is applying under to. With change with law, the object certainly from a universal detailed perspective changes, while at local environtment/situation/level may remain the same or have minor changes. So it is the laws on the items that give its identity and traits so to speak. From there, we can now see that money is functioning the way it is today because of the law that define its traits or behavior, so to speak. Abolishing certain laws would not damage money, the change merely transforms money - whether it would be renewed or gotten older. It's an invisible attachment, a good metaphor for describing the relation of money, which is the substance, with its law, there.
The substance shifts when its guiding policies and so on shifts, if to right direction, then better, reasonably, if opposite, then likely brings worse. This uses the similar philosophy that: One can act change on the substance without touching it at all or much by transforming/transmorphing, a word here I believe is quite fitting and describes well, its laws applied to it, which would inturn bring about change of its trait, functionalities and behaviors and whatnot. That'd be a good way to modify money from its current behavior. Problems would reduce, the actual crime rate would decrease rapidly, moral values would ascend back, and many other great things
No comments:
Post a Comment