Their Approach

If the approach is that of a low quality, for example something whack, then how could the outcome result be that well.

What they lack compared to me is not resource energy or time, or even platform or chances (opportunities). They lack the artistic delicate approach to things. For one, they do not use the style or approach of scientific methods though surely they had taken science classroom lessons and then enhancement courses during college years, surely?  Things are supposed to be tended to be put into parallelism, or parallel scopes, and whatnot. This in other words means to compare, carefully overlap the two, see their differences through narrowing down criterias, isolating disturbance factors and whatnot. All of which these not so successful candidates often not do. Secondly, they let go of questions and already moved onto the next or the one after one, not letting the questions be answered thoroughly. This run, do and abandon fashion style approach really leave their effort under the higher elevations. Perhaps all of this mentioned has been the actual main contributor to my difference with them - much more intelligent, wider knowledges and deeper understandings - beating them in all trilateral dimensions.

If one's approach is wrong, then the person(s) or group will not achieve high standards or reach success, for in order to be a king, one has to have tiger or lion aspects, and just like so in investigating a case, one has to be keen and examine the evidences with proper approaches (sometimes they are refered to as procedures or methods).

With the right methods, not more methods or the same old method that yield poor result done more numerous times. The gap between varius civilians, factions and clans serve as a great evidence for this - some civlizations remain in bone-wood age for thousands of years, perhaps often due to shortage of the aspects of discovery and meaningful approach to metalluries? All in all, in summary, the approach is really what matters, the base seperation, where indicator of success first initial appears. Comparison, use of parallel methods, careful managing and delicate marking and denotation done all contribute to success chance/rate and often determines success or dissapearance.