Never before in human history has the military main combat unit be that of semi-fit outsider of society mass peasant infantry units. This giant shift symbolized the shift in social structure and various other components, all of which carries significant importance and meaning. From a medieval knight standpoint, this shift by the least means introduction of fake order and replacement of the natural order, the law by nature - now as we see, a set of algorithms and rules set on paper as if can really so nearly of a good job as law of natural playout. So, now the outcome, who would be regarded as winner lays dependent on the quality and the content on those papers. If some content pre-determined to be correct, turn out to be wrong, how long would it take until we find out these has been errors and problems? In addition, will experts be able to find out where exactly was the error components ?
------------------------------------------------
(poem)
Law, a piece of paper with disorganized and un-readable text or irrelevent content is something regarded as the true law and the universal only law, and something of unchanging nature only because, it gets preceived this way. What matters in life is not what's real, but what's preceived to be real. Anybody would label anything as the opposite of what it is currently if they really dared or wanted to. In fact, the very word "what it is" implies use of subject view, which, all life forms are subjective compositions, leading to the firm principle about the universe, that all things and life forms are subjective. So then, when we say this is right, we are as disreasonable as the savage, except in that we consider and conduct/deal with enemies in different fashions. And the difference in fashion, landing within circle of "goodness", then we consider, and commonly does so, regard it as "noble or honorable". And that's exactly and precisely what honor means. Even this text is subjective, and then that means we have viewed subjectivism itself through a subject eye, so did we view subjectivism.. hmm, mysterious and miraculous, and yet seems to work - that's the wonders and natural workings of the universe, pretty damn splendid. In extract: key point number 1: honorable and dishonorable conduct not differ in "this is not right" or "that is illegal" claims, but precisely lies in the style, the conduct, the way - it has to be the honor type way of conduct. Key point number two: everything, which includes laws, ideals, way of life and argument points are entirely all subjective - there is no right, there is only savage or savage that operate more on rules and honors, whichever they may mean. Both laws stated also applies to this text, interestingly. That's the wonderous nature of the universe, isn't it.
Anywho, law, something entirely falls to subjectism cannot be regarded as truly universal law, but only a law, a particular one, and not the one. Further evidence proof of this is that without troops to defend the law, what law it actually is? If the new power dictates it to be junk or trash, then it would just be junk as quickly as sending an e-mail. Life is just, and simply power struggle. Within the power quadrants, there is worm power, maggot power, righteous horse dragon tiger spirit tie power, and many others - all are powers, thus are forces, and no one has the right to say dictate anything, you must when being savage, act as pure savage, and not claim otherwise.
(poem)
Law, a piece of paper with disorganized and un-readable text or irrelevent content is something regarded as the true law and the universal only law, and something of unchanging nature only because, it gets preceived this way. What matters in life is not what's real, but what's preceived to be real. Anybody would label anything as the opposite of what it is currently if they really dared or wanted to. In fact, the very word "what it is" implies use of subject view, which, all life forms are subjective compositions, leading to the firm principle about the universe, that all things and life forms are subjective. So then, when we say this is right, we are as disreasonable as the savage, except in that we consider and conduct/deal with enemies in different fashions. And the difference in fashion, landing within circle of "goodness", then we consider, and commonly does so, regard it as "noble or honorable". And that's exactly and precisely what honor means. Even this text is subjective, and then that means we have viewed subjectivism itself through a subject eye, so did we view subjectivism.. hmm, mysterious and miraculous, and yet seems to work - that's the wonders and natural workings of the universe, pretty damn splendid. In extract: key point number 1: honorable and dishonorable conduct not differ in "this is not right" or "that is illegal" claims, but precisely lies in the style, the conduct, the way - it has to be the honor type way of conduct. Key point number two: everything, which includes laws, ideals, way of life and argument points are entirely all subjective - there is no right, there is only savage or savage that operate more on rules and honors, whichever they may mean. Both laws stated also applies to this text, interestingly. That's the wonderous nature of the universe, isn't it.
Anywho, law, something entirely falls to subjectism cannot be regarded as truly universal law, but only a law, a particular one, and not the one. Further evidence proof of this is that without troops to defend the law, what law it actually is? If the new power dictates it to be junk or trash, then it would just be junk as quickly as sending an e-mail. Life is just, and simply power struggle. Within the power quadrants, there is worm power, maggot power, righteous horse dragon tiger spirit tie power, and many others - all are powers, thus are forces, and no one has the right to say dictate anything, you must when being savage, act as pure savage, and not claim otherwise.
No comments:
Post a Comment