They

Those that act more make more mistakes.
Those that don't act don't make any mistakes.

To act or not to act?

For, for hack. Since I lack the mac for the sack, Goldman's sack.


--- --- ----     --- --- ----  
They act too much, on the wrong thing. Had they ever thought, perhaps paused a little at least, and considered for possible double-trickery or ultra-hidden tricks at the snatch.  Funny how for all humans, whether commercial or legal, doctorial or general, evil or innocent, angel or imp tend to much act and respond too much, basically coiling in this unsafe and easy-to-get-mistakes-generated act - the mouther drain field, so to speak. A much more reliable way of talking would be body language or chemical scent detection, which they seem to not have, all of them seem to not have such fond about.

Has the members of ADL, despite their monetary lures, ever thought or paid the attention to the possible question that perhaps all this "victim" or "criminals" caught by the ADL detection and investigator units perhaps are getting into a big trouble - because these "criminals" or "victims" all actually are doing this hidden trick behind their talks - perhaps something like to get the ADL memebers and thus the New World Order itself to continue on the wrong path of life? Is this correct, is this possible, and had they ever considered that -- surely it's something worthy of considering - at least once, right?  Life isn't always about  thinking too much, but inquiring things at least once would be fairly reasonable, correct? As since most of them consider themself to be the thinker of all creatures - the smarter one and the smartest compared to other life organisms.

Anything much delicate and too fragile (implies easy to turn) like verbal communication, which means includes warfare talk, peace talk, friendly talks and all kinds of other verbal interactions or acts taken place subject under the title category "verbal communicat", should be taken careful tread with/of. Surely, a mistep or even the right step may result in the breakage of some link or whatnot here and there, altering the final result - sometimes leading to the wrong island. Imagine if the world and all creatures was solely dependent on mouth signalling for exachange of info, communication and being the only sole way of communication, then wouldn't the world be a total mess, so mess that the mess itself is also in its own mess? Has anyone of you self-proclaimed wise beings out there thought of this? Perhaps it's time to take a serious step back, away from the use of mouth-communication so much and start working on something anew? Diverge the focus elsewhere, channel the concentration to some other equalvalent parallel neighboring task that isn't as risky and prone-to-error and fragile-to-turbulances-or-orrors. Something so delicate and sensitive to damage thing like verbal communication should at least be approached, dealt with, held with the astonding and solid knowings that verbal communication should be treaded lightly, and things cannot be taken seriously (with a large magnitude) for it could easily be wrong - nothing is perfect in that realm - everything, at least a 0.15% scatter rate; the inpossibility; the vowel-tan-cord-rebound-anecdote thing (if you know what I mean).