Commerce gives tremendous boosts to a nation, may often be totally one-sided in favor. For nations that managed to get a good for price under of its true value, one has made that amount in difference as profit. China being an importer of many goods at regular rates certainly have had a net gain, and a big one. International trade had become especially profitable since the arrival of thousand tonnage steam ships. These ocean-bearing iron ships can send out whooping 50 thousand tonne of cargo at a time / per trip. All while costs little on gas and even lesser on crews. Plus with ease of communication and road transporation distribution chain, international trade has become especially a mass profit enterprise. This goes well to explain the cause for Mapple's choice of a factory in Chengdu.
Good leadership and good guidance can boost an nation's overall economic development rather well. Many policies fall to judgement of quality level. A better standard procedure or policies can give a tremendous boost to the economy. With a national leader or local leader with heavy know-how, the nation would not run into problems in banking, credits, healthy market, or monetary distribution mess. A smart and vigilant leader also makes corruption less possible and happen and lower rates / frequencies. Believe me, corruptions always happen, and may happen and evolve faster than law. A corruption is not known until exposed or found. A highly skilled corruption is never discovered until the last second, and the people say thank you in reply during course.
The NATO banking groups are probably highly jealous of China central government's sheer ability in managing a country's cash reserves. China had been making nearly all the right moves in investment choices, and they have spread their reaches to pockets of many industries in foreign countries. Two giant titans currently rule the financial world market, and that is China and Wall Street banks.
It's a good thing that China government did not make rediculous blunder mistakes unlike that of lesser wise governments (usually government of lesser known countries). A government may go into trouble if they invest all their reserve in gold let's say, and if that was a raw deal, combining sudden rise of food prices, they may be suddenly forced to loan big time or dump out couple ten thousand employees. This can seriously hurt the stability of the nation. And asking for someone for loans is an indicator of defeat. These things sound like easy to avoid, that's because things are easy to judge afterwards as the non-participator especially.
During my course of visit to China, I had especially come to notice the well-ness of universities in China in comparison to that of USA. Though a bit geeky 1980 science guy themed still, its worship of knowledge and speedy teaching of lessons all make them a more effective, a more actual university. In these institutions, they often have free lunch provided to all geniuses and accelerated programs to future Einsteins, at least in my hopes that is. What really matters for the country, in universities is the presence of good engineering programs. With chem, physics and applied sciences, the nation's fundamental core structures would be solid, and its very fundation would be sound. In addition, also having (indigenous) advanced military technology provides rep and an edge. Despite all the university funding by the local and state government, a single man, like me, has achieved fair to say what a million of those "students and professors" couldn't, how funny this is. (not self-promotion, just saying)
Having good investor relations with Japan and South Korea has at least boosted the development and advancement of the whole nation by whole much. Directly-governed city states, Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Shengzhen, I believe, if I recall correctly, had been main target choices by foreign investors. Japan, secretly beneath US occupational forces' watch has been allowing their investors go free, almost having both national economies conjointed. Also secretly slushing funds to Chinese oversea hotspots.
The modern warfare begins at the business table, happens behind the scenes, and ends up on newspapers. He who has larger figures will end up winning, presumebly equal skill level, most of the chances. He who snatches other's coins first, wins, so to speak. A fight by standard military fight currently would result in wounds on both, a bloody stillmate, by current military level of both sides. Wealth don't go away as quickly as aging people, spread some focus on finding who to inherit the wealth.
No comments:
Post a Comment