Drone World War

This war will be a funny one, It will be like that of a group of musketeers (vs) murduring Indians, depicted in typical New World Order indian-hating textbooks. The side with better drones would likely score such a good war result that the other side will cry genocide to the international communities. But unlike that of man-operated drones of humanoid infantry troops, the AI of autonomous battle robots may not have a component for dealing with fast early surrenders. So, they would likely move from door to door, checking for any enemy combatants, and probably out of their poor programming, all the innocents would be treated as enemy unit, and thus be receiving the final treatment. These cases likely will not occur, but who knows, even Macrohard software, the operating systems, did not reach full properness until Vista, hasta la vista, baby.  Overall, one side will score high victory, while the other be left in defeat, in number of losses and also in morale. Just like the savage wild jungles, there are no predator-prey differences or relations, only greater predators.  Oh wait, interestingly, that's also the case everywhere, and especially in the wild urban jungles of New York. Heh, how funny is that is, yeh.  A war without aim or bright objectives sure would be a child's dreamy fantasy, and not an actual war plan then. Getting a drone combat army ready can be difficult. Financing them is not all that difficult as chips and alluminum and lithium battery cost cheaper than wood furnitures. Getting them manufactured in mass numbers can be done via Womanshoeton project organization model copy, so to speak. The most difficult part of getting the drone invasion force ready would be the lack of ingenuity for reaching, if not ever reaching the needed design level. Programming AI can be hard, but no harder than this blog, hehe. I myself is actually in fact also in the progress of writing some artificial AI algorithm tips and fundamental principles and tips on robotics intelligence. This field is fairly new, though started long ago, presumably by its sheer difficulty, it never grew. The field has massive potential, once it reached milestone 1, it will go big onward, maybe rather quickly, and it can go really big from there.  Achieving breakthroughs almost require intelligence level of an omniscient being, such as the author. He must has reached the levels of piercing celestial understanding then can he be the great innovator or inventor of this field. There will be many who try, whom many will get end up trapped and tormented / burned out by the sheer tremendous request and all the stress and what not so to speak. Such "adventures" are advised to be not entered unless the person can handle, the burden, the twist and turns and the drag and stress. Many will end up flame backfire burned, leaving with not an ounce of achievementalnal reward but scars and wounds, all over body and mind. The state of condition of thephysiology  of the adventurers won't end up too nice.  I am pretty sure many scientists and experts realized this, which goes to explain so few wanted/chose to devote their passion into those work fields. Don't try it  if it cannot be done, I think this one-liner summarizes and fits it well.  

He who really does end up making superb enough AI must be smart enough fellow, definately someone of extraordinary abilities and feat. This mini-law of nature serve as an excellent natural-block for those that seek to use the power to bad means, as it deters anyone except  the ones deserving to reach the tree top to open/unlock the secrets within.  Hey, perhaps I should try inventing robot advanced AI. That sounds like a good idea, but how do you know I hadn't started already? muah hahah, muah hahahhahahaha