o

o
1goodness2

Friday 3 January 2014

What was better, letting communist china party butcher mandarin, or

This urge of feeling, this jerked up reaction came about from using it just earlier writing another piece (post). I had come to realization of it all of a sudden.  Did the changes or advertised-as improvements to the Chinese Writing Characters done by the communist party of china generate a total net gain or a net loss?

Analysis: the juice and essence did seem had gotten taken out by a bit.  This highly seems so now the more I look at it with a clear peaceful and unbiased approach. The language though did get shortened in "exhaustfulness", but that only came into play from their faulty following of a wrong-to-begin-with principle, a faulty principle sitting at guiding principle position, which was: it's necessary for every single citizen, person within this country in other words, to be able to read and write at certain level.  This goal is our opinion was wrong to begin with.  Likely something of largely advisory pressure from Soviets and Roothenchild Dominion group, not something of proper individual ideal quality premium thinking out of wisdom, dreams, persuation and all kinds of other goodness.
- - - 

Hmm, what was better at the time, letting communist China take over which eventually brought on cultural revolution mess, economic misplanning, massive local corruption, heavy errosive internal conflicts and introduction of some of the prettybads standards and merits - namely, the simplified version of the Hanzi charactericatures plus the style of writing and architecture?

Or let the Sun Yet-son founded Kuomingtan (Republic of China) to run as the government?

Neither appeals to me, for, a true Chinese state should have Oriental element, and not Soviet or Americano traits, outlooks, views on life and so on. After the Communist Party beat the Kuomingtan, they took over pretty much every sector - economic, seaports, railways, trade posts, markets, factories, urban and cultural centres, temples, military camps plus universities. With the dictatorial behavior, they disallowed others' opinions at least by passive measures, which eventually led to the junky Soviet elements and its own cultural aspect (which is a lesser of China should take it) into many of the veins of China - architecture schools, common measurement, construction, bridge building and motovehicle philosophy and standards, the writing itself even, and many more.  Before the 1949-1950, writings in China were strictly of the right to left type and from up to down direction, later it began the left to run writing style due to introduction of pens. But nowhere near during those periods did the standard of practice in governments and abroad became strictly that of Soviet writing mode and fashion.  The damage done by this thing itself is not visibly much, but fundamentally many.  Furthermore, it is a (the) symbol of disturbance, thus destruction, from worm-chewing-on-paper-ish toward inward centre of the Oriental Cultural lineage, understanding and philosophies.

Until the current Chinese state officials adapt back their tradition, in proper ways and in pure modes, their thinking will continue to be that of a half-east-half-west frankenstein type of stiched up copytone 2nd grader wannabe. Only in pure unity of one self, of one's own cultureself too can things function in rightful manners.

Personal reflection about this writing thus far: I think the writing is so superbly done that I should be saluting in this action: shouting towards the horizon, with the affirmation: "Es Lebe myself!",  for my glorious insight! It means "long live myself" in German.

Es lebe my great vocals, es lebe my insights!   (oh well sounds not so good in English) (meh)

      - 

No comments:

Post a Comment